Kearney vs Abruzzo (How it all started 11/27/2012 to Present.
- Private009 Kearney
- Mar 21, 2022
- 2 min read
I called Louis to set up meeting to discuss possibilities around selling shares of MPK trust. During meeting Louis suggested that trust C 110 shares could be purchased at a price of $76,000.00 per share with a possible 6% bump up in price.
I was taken back because we had no success in the past discussions concerning the MPK Trusts B & C. Louis, also as stated in document below, made the statement that he and John Chavez had turned this purchase inside and out.
Consider this. Why would the Arco/Abruzzo family believe that it would be fair to buy back/terminate trust C (110 shares) of Marypats for a price less than the most current buy back from current shareholder which at the time was 62,000.00 per share and offered the Marypat trust 45,000.00 per share? Additionally, ARCO attorney Marjorie Rogers was shepherding the transaction for ARCO/Abruzzo family. The only thing missing here is a lot of Fiduciary duties by all involved.
This is a document that shows outline of Inheritance fraud and complicity. Some people get 100%,85%,80,%,79%,75%,70%,39% of Book. When Arco bylaws say buy back shares at book value.
Marjorie's letter pertaining to dividend retaliation because of litigation in 2013.
Please refer to gross revenue & cash reserves and dividend pay out far right on distribution break out sheet.
In a hearing, Judge Malott responds to the offer by saying "there's nothing here".
FYI - Judge Malott said "there was nothing here" in the Rosenstiel-Dacades case. Later he was pressured to reverse his ruling for financial transparency in part by the Albuquerque Journal and a whistle blower.
Loan history Victor, Louis and Questions that would give evidence to our interaction.
Comments